Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
Hey man, don't apologise for intellectualising. I live for that haha.

But philosophy is one thing and politics is another. This for me is the biggest problem with Chinese politics as I see it, and politics in general. Of course people are happy to say 'twas ever thus' when they are at the top, but it is important. I think China is even worse than anyone for that, like they will invoke ancient China, and what they are evoking is awful.
They are not so into banning mobile phones or promoting footbinding, or the government being so rubbish that the British bullied them
In metphyascs China is unique, but it's still a bunch of people who eat and poo. Not long ago China was a poor country with a mad old man in charge, then it was a hyper capitslist country. Now it has a mad guy in charge again, lets put bets on how that works out lol
I think that what 'we' and 'the Chinese' often miss in this conversation is that whole 'you can't go back into the same river' thing

Not to be that guy, but  yyyyyyyyyy...

The idea that history has a direction is not a Chinese idea. The world and all the stuff of the world is in a state of constant change, but cyclical change, motion between poles. Time as such is a circle. Up until barbarian science started making the material conditions of China look stupid, in principle, if you were metaphysical enough, there would come a "time" when you could step back into the same river.

I guess that's the real meaning of "5000 years". It's not a long time, it's a thoroughly complex and vastly sophisticated eternal now.

And just to be prosaic, it's probably why "development" finished biding it's Deng Xiaoping time and became "Rejuvenation".

Which is to say, a properly educated Chinese might want to say the modern concept of change, that you can't go back to yesterday, is entirely too short sighted. An enlightened ruler, for instance, might for a while tolerate the young people's notion that everything's different now, grandad, but he'd know that what's really going on is......


I wonder if modern China has a notion of entropy.
The Champagne Cabana / Re: What's Making Me Happy!
« Last post by Escaped Lunatic on September 08, 2021, 05:08:19 PM »
Bad news, good news.
The town in XJ is right on the border of Something-Or-Other-istan.  Evidently, it takes considerable time to get a proper permit to let a foreigner wander about there, and they didn't realize a foreigner was part of the group until too late.  ananananan

I've already let the coordinator of permit things know that I plan to go to that town in XJ sometime during the Spring semester, so there should be more than enough time to get all the paper work down for that trip.

In related news, those going to XJ will then move on to Qinghai.  I've already got flight booked for Friday morning and will get there before them.  That will give me time to play tourist for a day or two.  It's quite a mix of groups there - Hui, Tu, Tan, Mongol, and more minority groups.

And it looks like my Hunan trip got moved up to the end of September.  Things will be busy.
I think that what 'we' and 'the Chinese' often miss in this conversation is that whole 'you can't go back into the same river' thing

Chinese culture, like every national culture, is by definition conservative and weird, and completely unrealistic. I first went to China in 2009 and it was completely different thing to what it is now, officially and in reality. It's changed just as much as the USA or Oz or Europe. I don't know about Oz, but the UK in 2009 was the end of New Labour regime and the US was all excited or furious about Obama. Those are foreign countries to time travellers from there and it's the same in China, it would be as weird to go from Hu Jintao China to XiJingPing China as it would to go from Obama America to Biden America, and it's not even a huge amount of time.

There is an element of 'la plus c'e change', but there is also the fact that we are travelling forward in time involuntarily. I lived in China for 7 years and love the place. Got married, saw some horrific stuff, saw some beautiful stuff, became 'Sinicized' without adapting at all, I am still pretty rubbish at speaking Chinese to be honest, but I do have a handle on the way of life and the thinking. But then to a Chinese person I am totally clueless, not because they all love this idea of China, there is just no way I could get my head around what they hate about China. I hate it for such different reasons as them
Arguably, it's a generational thing. The previous generation of work environments were marked by all sorts of Wild East phenomena and we were all, except for tru noobs who could perhaps be helped by an Internet Saloon of Experienced and Hardened Shady Characters Wielding Questionable Beverages, kind of able to see and characterise those phenomena - weird contracts, astonishing conditions, visa oddities, super dangerous managers, and running in the night. Back then it was "Do I hono(u)r this contract or wat?" These days it's not yet decided what the real question should be. Is it "Just how Chinese do I have to be?" or is it "Now that China is Ascendant, do I need to be a western apologist? Can I be foreign in Rome without being pressed into the legions?"

Does the fact we don't know the modern age's Coming to China question mean there isn't one anymore? I mean, is there still a Coming to China question? Does anyone still go, really?

I watched C-beams glitter in the dark
Bait and switch, quick pull rugs, etc. are common in nearly all employment situations.  Sometimes it's a failure in pre-hire communication and sometimes it's a deliberate thing.

I personally got terribly screwed over (robbed of significant amounts of cash, lost all paid sick and holiday time) in my first job in China.  This wasn't a Chinese cultural issue.  This was 2 former Saloon members (one Australian and one Canadian) who hired and managed FTs for a Chinese company.  Their planned luxurious life of teaching a few hours per week while directing others to do most of the labor didn't work out.  Instead of trying to cut expenses in other ways, they hired 2 more FTs and shortly thereafter unilaterally changed the contracts of all their FTs.  Since I was already past the halfway point, really enjoyed being in China (except for working for a pair of cheating scum), and didn't have another job readily available, I put up with it.  The next two FTs they hired after I left both did a runner very quickly after being subjected to even more abuse (like being forced to work 7 days per week).

My advice - read the contract carefully.  Make sure the contract you sign is exactly the same as the one that came with the offer.  If a job starts demanding more that what the contract requires, it still comes down to adapt or migrate.  Having some sort of backup plan can make that migration as simple as jumping to another company nearby.
That's it, I guess: how much lip service do you pay to the culture when in theory what you were hired for doesn't.... have a role in the culture?  Damn. I suppose it's not really possible to be hired for anything like that unless the hirer is looking for you to be a change agent. Which is not what any Chinese hirer is actually looking for even though there is (or used to be) a lot of superficial rhetoric to that effect.

I suppose my question is not really about assimilation. It's more really just a statement, again, of disappointment. They said they wanted change. They said they wanted a breath of fresh air to enliven or enlighten their educational approaches. They said I was there to introduce new ideas. Then right at the end they said I was supposed to have made friends with leaders. Bait: switch. Rug: pull.

When in Rome, make sure you interpret Roman pronouncements correctly.
Obligations are as insidious as rights, bruh, and just as alienating. Like for instance, "adapt". Adapt on your own terms or someone else's?

Or... "expert". An expert in my own terms or someone else's? If someone else knows better than me what my expertise means for them, then any hiring is in their terms. But what if I know something they don't? Or more importantly, won't.

The former employer had started signalling the importance of academic output. Like, somehow foreign staff would produce research papers. That's creative work. That kind of expertise, most espeically when the employer is not currently possessed of that expertise and hires you to get it, needs to be heavily circumscribed by any number of stipulations if you want it to not run outside the bounds of whatever you can tolerate culturally. Staff presumably adjusts to that by not actually focusing too much on creation. Actually, culturally speaking, that is what I saw at the former establishment, all these "academics" who looked a whole lot more like middle class family tenders. The first priority in creation was children, making them. Second was wealth, making that. The third... I don't think it was knowledge. I think "knowledge" probably came in after comfort or security and a workable timetable.

Something weird going on there.
In general, western cultures focus more on protecting the rights of the individual and Asian cultures focus more on obligations to family/society.  All cultures come to a balance of the two, but cultures that go to far towards either extreme eventually find the point where things get unstable.

Anti-vaxxers/Anti-maskers in many countries fall back on "my rights" to justify themselves without any thought of any possible obligation to society.  People like this are using their rights to place others at unnecessary risk.

Rights come with obligations.  In nearly all countries, you don't get the right to drive unless you pass a test about the rules for basic obligations for sharing the road with others.

Sometimes, the way countries react to so-called "universal" rights does not match the stereotypes.  The US voted against food being a human right.  China voted for it.

You aren't under any obligation to take a job in China.  If you feel you can't adapt to a new job in China, stay in Australia or pick a country more to your liking.  If you can adapt, balance the decision based on comparisons of jobs and work culture in China vs Australia (or other locations you may be considering) instead of worrying about abstract West vs East ideals.
I wonder if it'll turn out Chinese believe in universal human obligations.

Not rights. That's for individuals. But obligations, that's what you have toward the locus of identity. (I was going to say "to the collective", but that's not right.)

Probably if we want to understand the impact or meaning of these universal human obligations, we should look to Chinese reaction against universal human rights.

Disclaimer: individuals can do anything, be anything, it's culture that's polarized, not people, because without a pole there is no direction to face aka assertion of value, so it's not exactly the same as racism when you say Chinese/Western CULTURE has some extreme elements.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10