EL, it is fine if you don't want to eat at McD's because they suck, but I'd give you the sideye if you never ever set foot in any Western restaurant and criticized those who do.
I only criticize Chinese parents who are making their little darlings into balls of lard by feeding them McMeals 20 times a week.
On the other hand, I'm not exactly an unknown person at the local Papa John's Pizza.
It is also fine if Chinese people do like their McD's and Wal Mart. The franchises wouldn't have survived here if Chinese people weren't into them. They're the ones whose opinions really count.
My main objection to WalMart applies to WalMarts anywhere. It's like one of those invasive plants that slowly pushes out all the other competition and leaves a monoculture where once there had been a diverse ecosystem. Just to make it less pleasant, Wal Marts in the US seem to have picked up ideas on how to
mistreat employees from 3rd world sweatshops.
But I still shop there a lot of the time.
The thing about the "Somewhat more classical and traditional China" is that, for a lot of the locals living in our pastoral paradises, life isn't really all that great. A lot of them would much rather have "westernized, modern China" where there is at least somewhat decent medical care, where kids don't have to walk 3 hours through the mountains to get to school, where women can do something besides get married at 20 and start popping out (their legally allotted number of) babies, where guys can actually make a living doing something other than backbreaking fieldwork.
I wholly agree. I've seen some rural villages that were . . . less than pleasant places to live. I just hate the thought of replacing an entire way of life with a modern, westernized one instead of trying to see what can be done about correcting the serious issues and improving people's lifestyles while preserving as much of the local culture and architecture as feasible.
It's not just the quaint rural areas. How many of those hutongs are left in Beijing? Should we relegate those to one tiny area just for tourists? To relegate a lifestyle that's existed for hundreds of years to museum status is a disturbing concept.
Sure, a 20 story apartment building is a much more efficient usage of space. If we use efficiency as the only standard, there are a lot of cultural treasures around the world that should be bulldozed to make room for another Wal-Mart and/or apartment buildings.
Wander around the non-tourist zones of a major international city (tourist zones may be fascinating, but are somewhat artificial by their very nature). Let's say New York and London as example). Then head to a smaller, less international city in the same country. The "feel" of the place is probably different. Is the smaller city more "real". No. Is it more like what that country would be expected to be in a traditional sense? Probably.
It used to be easy to get an idea of what region of the US you were in by local architectural styles. It's getting harder and harder. It's usually pretty easy to tell what region of the world you are in from the local architecture. Each year, that gets harder.
What if the whole world ends up being nothing but Walmarts, McD's, starbucks, and massive apartment buildings and offices? What if all countries end up having their local cultures converge towards a single world standard? What will be the point of traveling?