Rereading Marcus Aurelius's Meditations and Zhuangzi [only the thin paperbacks made the trans-Pacific cut]. To my reading they differ only in the role intelligence plays in ordering one's affairs, but both deeply recognize the paucity of particulars in relation to the universal.
However Aurelius frequently returns to the human scale, half by necessity and half by philosophical bent, while Zhuangzi revels in the inhuman. The Chinese philosopher is closer to nature, but useless, and admittedly so, while the Roman emperor must spend his time chasing ideals half congruent with his worldly duties.