The BBC being subjective and presenting only one side of the argument? no! never. hahaha...
They aren't as bad as some others, though. I was in Iran during their revolution and media coverage was horrendous.
Time and Newsweek were wildly inaccurate, entirely unbelievable to anyone on the ground who had an idea of what was actually happening. The only print media I saw that was anywhere near correct was Paris Match.
As for broadcast, the joke among expats was that the US-run service and Radio Moscow were having a contest to see who could tell the most outrageous lies. I thought the Russians were winning, but not by much.
BBC World Service was a whole lot better, everyone;s main news source. Expats listened in English, locals in Persian and the Shah tried to block both. Of course they got some things wrong; the country was in chaos and no-one knew what was going on. But they were obviously the best source available, and by quite a wide margin,
Bravo Beeb & Britain, say I,